The ‘Unofficial Channels’ column of this month’s Wire magazine (#344) hosts a very short piece I’ve written on Acoustic Synthesis, giving a short overview on experimental manoeuvrings in the largely undefined sphere of post-electronic music.
As described elsewhere, ‘post-electronic music’ is a term I use to refer to the application of classical electronic music technique to acoustic systems, usually involving electro-mechanical parts and mechanical gears.
The sub-harmonic demonstrations of music theorist José A. Sotorrio are mentioned in the column. Sotorrio’s introduction to the undertone series can be viewed here on Youtube. A sounding tuning fork held against a movable obstruction (such as paper) produces different notes of the undertone series (seen at 1:00 in the video). The ease at which the undertones can be elicited in physical vibrating systems provides glimpses of a sonic netherworld quite distinct from musical traditions derived from the overtone series.
Acoustic synthesis (as I practice it, at least) is principally concerned with enhancing the exactness with which mechanical controls act upon vibrating assemblies. For instance, an electromagnetically sustained tuning fork may be gradually brought into contact with the paper by a vernier gear with a very high reduction ratio – this would allow undertones to be slowly scanned through discretely and selected. These kinds of colliding interactions are an integral part of tone production.
|The usage of adjustable prong-umbrellas to build up subharmonics (note the usage of a reverberant grille-pile)
The rich effect of subharmonics / undertones can be heard at the end of this short unfinished study on a small apparatus. The growling occurs due to a vibrating prong colliding with a Rice Krispies box, periodically repelling it, before making contact again. A swinging microphone adds a timbre shifting effect.
One may well wonder about the origins of post-electronic music. I had often wondered if an ‘acoustic equivalent’ of a synthesiser was theorised during the electronic music heyday of the 1970s, or even earlier. It seems that this was indeed almost touched upon by Terence Dwyer in his 1975 school course Making Electronic Music (Book 2 – Advanced). The work of Terence Dwyer (now in his 90s) has received fresh attention recently thanks to Ian Helliwell‘s captivating article in last month’s The Wire (#343).
It is interesting to find Terence Dwyer suggesting the acoustic mimicry of electronic sounds in a volume of his Making Electronic Music textbook. The textbooks serve as an introduction to the rudiments of electronic music for school students, but are practically concerned with tape splicing and tape effects. Curiously, Book 2 contains a small section titled ‘Imitating Electronic Sounds’ – wonderful wispings towards a post-electronic modus operandi! Acoustic equivalents are given: electronic waveforms and their acoustic substitutes:
Sine wave (pure, no harmonics) – Recorder, Tuning Fork, Whistling, Rubbed Wine Glass
Sawtooth (ramp) wave (all harmonics) – Kazoo, Comb and Paper
Squarewave (odd numbered harmonics) – Clarinet
White noise (random superimposition of all frequencies) – Vocal hissing by several people
Filtered noise (narrow bands of random frequencies) – One person making various hissings such as Ss, Sh, Ch, F, V, Z, Zh, Kh, Hh